A Fair and Ethical Process - Capital Punishment Essay Example
The death penalty is a form of capital punishment that is used for extremely unethical and horrendous acts by a person. Forms of the death penalty includes; lethal injection, firing squad, and gas chambers. In today’s society there are many recent and relevant cases on the death penalty involving the effectiveness of the death penalty. Along with this, activists continue to attempt to promote and bring to life the idea that the cruel acts of people should be punished by death. An example of its relevance today would be the case of Jacob Sullivan, who was sentenced to death after a relentless murder. After this sentence was given, many had mixed opinions on whether this was ethical or not. How ethical and fair is the death penalty? The death penalty is fair because those who ruthlessly harm others with no resent do not deserve a place on earth, even if it is in jail, along with this, it is ethical because the current forms of the death penalty are made to be humane.
The death penalty should be maintained because brutal murders deserve no other chance of happiness because they have taken it away from someone else. On the other hand, some may claim that the an inmate’s time in jail (especially for life) is horrible, and is scarier or more threatening than the death penalty. This is not the truth, prisons often allow well-behaved inmates to receive privileges inside of cells providing comfort to the “well-behaved inmate.” This is just not fair, a murder should not be able to receive such privileges in a cell after the horrible crime that they have committed (Dow). From TVs to handing previous murders scissors to give others haircuts, acting nice to officers in prison can get you very comfortable. This most likely is not the punishment that a victim’s family would want for their loved one’s murderer. A death sentence can provide closure to a family that the person that has scared them for the rest of their lives will never do it to anyone ever again. There is a claim that the death penalty is does not result in less murders, this is also a false statement. There is a link between both executions and murder rates, which means that executions can actually save people’s lives.
Another assumption with the death penalty, specifically the most current form, is the faults with the execution. Some want to abolish the death penalty for the 1-4% of executions that are of innocent people. This is not the death penalty’s fault, it is the person who sentenced the person incorrectly. Innocent deaths should not be blamed on the death penalty, it should be blamed on the jury (Preface to ‘Is the Death Penalty Just and Ethical?). Ethicality is an issue to many when it comes to the death penalty which, in the minds of others, does not make any sense. This is because the ones who are being sentenced to death did not care about ethicality, anyone’s feelings, or anyone’s life for that matter.
The people being sentenced to death row are killers who do not deserve anything but the worst. Also, voters should not decide the fate of a killer, the victim’s family should, they are not the ones who dealt with the crime so they should not determine what is ethical and what the fate of the murderer should be (Evan). On the contrary, some believe that killing in general is unethical and it should especially not be done by the state (Preface to ‘Is the Death Penalty Just and Ethical?). This is a valid statement, no one should be killed, innocently, but how does one protect a person who broke their ethical views and murdered someone? Does this person not deserve punishment? The death penalty is, in most cases, done more ethically than the murderer killing his victim, which seems ethical enough (Evan).
The death penalty provides threatening but humane punishment. Continuing the death penalty allows for a punishment that many would not like to face. This results in lowered murder rates than if the death penalty was abolished (Jones). Contrary perspectives may claim that the death penalty procedure is inhumane, and that is a reason that it should not exist. This is not true, the death penalty is arguably as humane as the death penalty can get. Inmates are transferred to a separate cell and allowed to rest for the next day, which is their death sentence date. Afterwards, the inmate is allowed to eat their last meal and be put to death by lethal injection. For a murderer to be as calmly put to death as this, it seems to be humane and ethical (Capital Punishment). People who serve the death penalty are fairly and humanely put to death for the procedure is calm, professional, and fast. It is fair because the crime they have committed must have been brutal enough to get sentenced the death penalty in court, so they know what they did and deserve what they are going to get with the death penalty.
The death penalty is a fair and ethical process and should be continued, the death penalty punishes murderers fairly in an ethical procedure. It is an ethical process that allows the inmate to receive his punishment humanely. The death penalty provides closure to families and also brings fairness in today’s society. The death penalty is a great thing to maintain in the United States because of the reduced murder rates and the fairness to the victim’s families. It is important because people’s lives are on the line having murderers not fear the death penalty, murderers need to know there is a serious punishment for their crimes.